SchoolsWeb

SEND Support and Graduated Approach

SEND Support and Graduated Approach

SEND Support

SEND Support is the category of support for: 

  • children and young people (CYP),
  • with special educational needs and/or disabilities (SEND),
  • who do not have an Education, Health and Care Plan (EHCP).  

SEND Support refers to the additional provision, adaptations and support offered within educational settings. This is done in accordance with the SEND Code of Practice (2015) and is based on a graduated approach. It emphasises early identification. This is a needs-led response, and the use of the Assess, Plan, Do, Review (APDR) cycle. 

This approach requires schools and other educational providers to: 

  1. identify a pupil’s needs promptly
  2. plan appropriate support
  3. implement targeted interventions
  4. regularly review the effectiveness of the support provided

The aim is to ensure all CYP with SEND receive tailored support to help them thrive, regardless of whether they have an EHCP. It aims to foster an inclusive learning environment and promote positive outcomes. 

The Graduated Approach

The graduated approach is a structured process designed to address the diverse needs of CYP with SEND. It is initiated at the whole-school level. It engages all educators in a continuous cycle of assessment, planning, implementation, and review.

For learners with SEND, this process is further tailored to individual needs. Understanding the strengths and needs of pupils is essential to provide effective and timely support. Where a pupil is identified as having SEND, schools need to take action to remove barriers which prevent pupils from progressing (SEND CoP, 2015). 

All professionals working with CYP play an essential role in applying the graduated approach. The approach is based on four key stages: Assess, Plan, Do, Review (APDR).

Assess

The child or young person’s needs are carefully identified through assessment. This involves gathering views from: 

  • parents or carers
  • where appropriate, the child or young person themselves

The process also includes input from any professionals involved and consideration of relevant information. This thorough assessment ensures that the right type of support can be planned.

Plan

The educational setting, together with all relevant parties, agrees on the specific outcomes that SEND Support aims to achieve for the CYP. Everyone involved has the opportunity to contribute to decisions about what support will be provided and when progress will be reviewed. This includes parents/carers and professionals. 

Do

The agreed support is put in place. The class teacher (or equivalent) remains responsible for the day-to-day teaching and support of the child or young person. However, the Headteacher, the SENDCo and other support staff will work closely alongside the teacher to monitor how well the support is working.

Review

At the agreed review point, the support is evaluated to determine: 

  1. whether it is making a positive difference
  2. whether the intended outcomes are being achieved. 

This stage also involves discussing whether any adjustments to the support are needed to better meet the child or young person’s needs.

As the cycle progresses, educators grow their understanding of pupils’ 

  • strengths
  • needs
  • aspirations

This allows for personalised planning. 

SEND support is delivered through this cyclical model. Each phase builds upon and refines previous strategies. This ensures approaches remain effective and responsive to each learner. It facilitates progress and positive outcomes. 

Download a PDF of these visuals [PDF, 300KB]

Graduated Approach - Transitions Toolkit               Ordinarily Available Provision Review - Draft Universal Provision

SEND Support Plan

Find out more about the SEND Support Plan to be used by schools and educational settings. 

SEND Support Plan

 

Nurture Groups

Nutrure Groups consist of small classes in mainstream schools for pupils with social and emotional needs.

Find out more about Nurture Groups

 

SEND and Inclusion toolkits

Information and toolkits are available for professionals to support CYP, and their families. Additionally, links to toolkits for parents and carers are provided.

SEND and Inclusion Toolkits

 

When to request an Education, Health and Care Needs assessment

If you and the professionals who support your child believe s/he requires support which is over and above that ordinarily and universally available from mainstream resources, a request may be made for an EHC Needs Assessment. The request will usually be made by your child’s education setting, but parents can make the request themselves.

The legal test for an EHC Needs Assessment is from section 36 of the Children and Families Act 2014.

Find out more about EHC plans

 

Role of the SENCO and EHCCO

Special Educational Needs Coordinators (SENDCos) operate within educational settings to support CYP with SEND. They work closely with Education, Health, and Care Coordinators (EHCCOs) who work for Buckinghamshire SEND team to support them when an Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP) is requested or in place. 

Parents and carers are encouraged to initially seek assistance and guidance from the SENDCo, as they can then collaborate with EHCCos if further advice if needed. 

Learn more about SENCOs and EHCCOs

Forum

The forum exists to ensure that consistent, focused decision-making is aligned with current legislation. By working collaboratively and adopting a solution-focused approach, it aims to meet the needs of children and young people effectively and promote positive inclusion for all.

Find out more about the Forum

Exceptional support requests

A multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach is used across Buckinghamshire. This ensures coordinated and holistic support.

 

Resources

Children and Family Act (2014)

 Early Years Foundation Stage National Curriculum (other curriculum)

 Parent/Carer guidance to children’s learning and development in the EYFS

 School Age National Curriculum

 Post 16 Curriculum Guidance – Employment and Training

 National Association of Special Educational Needs

Was this page helpful?

Very poor
Poor
Neither good nor poor
Good
Very good